For all humankind
Academicsubsite
ZixuanZhang
ZixuanZhang
Ponder...

Taylor's theorem with Lagrange remainder

With , there is such that .

Theorem 3.22 (Taylor's Theorem: Lagrange Remainder)

Let be continuous, and assume its first derivatives are continuous as well, and that it is -times differentiable on . [This is all satisfied if where .]

Let the Taylor remainder be

Then there exists such that

Proof

By translation invariance it suffices to take ; otherwise apply the argument to .

Let be chosen so that , where

Then and for all . Applying Rolle’s theorem to between and gives with ; applying it again to between and gives ; after steps there is with

Hence , so

A second proof, applying Rolle’s theorem to a family of auxiliary functions , yields the Cauchy form of the remainder as well.

Order bound

If with , then is continuous and hence bounded on the compact interval: for

the Lagrange form gives

so is as . This does not say that as : even when , nothing controls how grows with . Nothing is special about : applying the theorem to covers increments with .

Related

Stated in